Articles in limbo and ALA web survey

Whose Garamond is it anyway?

If you flick through various foundry cat­a­logs for a Gara­mond revival or adap­tion, you’re prob­a­bly bound to dis­cover more than garalde type­faces. Inter­spersed amongst the many Gara­monds by Claude Gara­mond (or Gara­mont) you’ll find baroque faces works by another type designer, Jean Jannon…

I wanted to cover this little typo­graphic affair but quickly found the article gaining length and arguably bloat. It’s cur­rently in limbo—I can’t decide whether to trim or polish it. Should I go ahead with a large but more inter­est­ing article (includ­ing a brief history French printing—which is inter­est­ing in my opinion) or go for the concise shorter version? Bah.

I also found that I’m short in garalde type­faces. Accom­pa­ny­ing the article I’d prefer to offer garalde (and baroque) samples other than Gara­mond Premier Pro that’s on my Mac. Anyone with Bembo or another “Garamond” revival—either one by Gara­mond or Jean Jannon?

A List Apart

The Survery, 2008

ALA Survey 2008
ALA is again running their annual survey calling all those who work in the process of cre­at­ing web­sites. The survey closes on Tuesday the 26th of August—have you taken part?

Putting Our Hot Heads Together

“If more of us are think­ing ‘What can I contribute?’ instead of ‘Did I like this article?’ the entire con­ver­sa­tion is transformed.”

Punc­tu­a­tion changes made to retain sequen­tial quoting.

I also wanted to rec­om­mend article No. 265 Putting Our Hot Heads Together by Carolyn Wood. She offers a number of prac­ti­cal sug­ges­tions in nur­tur­ing col­lab­o­ra­tion in dis­cus­sion and comment threads that appear obvious, but only after reading. Her writing style makes the piece a plea­sure to read. Make sure to check that out.

Vivien’s review

In closing I also should pass on my thanks to Vivien from inspi​ra​tionbit.com who kindly cri­tiqued KLEPAS.ORG for me. Her thoughts and those that arose in the com­ments are going to help shape version 3 of this site; I’ve removed the clash­ing purple a:visited styling. Thanks again Vivien!

7 comments

  1. 1. slux
    Aug 13, 23:02

    The fonts pack at http://​www.​artifex.​com/​d​o​w​n​loads/ has URW Gara­mond No8. Long version sounds great, I know I’m inter­ested in hearing the long story, there was a bit that touched on the issue at I Love Typog­ra­phy.

  2. 2. libervisco
    Aug 14, 00:07

    I tried taking that survey, but ended up not fin­ish­ing it. I do build web sites, but I don’t seem to fit any of the cat­e­gories they pro­vi­sioned for. I only build my own web sites. It is my busi­ness and I’m pretty much in what­ever role I need to be, from a web designer, writer/editor, project manager etc.

    Perhaps this makes me not par­tic­u­larly great in any of these fields, but so far I managed well enough and learned quite a bit.

    Aren’t there others who are in the same boat? Cheers.

  3. 3. Pascal
    Aug 14, 09:53

    @slux: Thank you so much for the link, par­tic­u­larly given it’s a free package of faces licensed under the AFPL. I’ll def­i­nitely have to feature the Gara­mond in the article.

  4. 4. inspirationbit
    Aug 14, 16:42

    I too would love to read your article on Gara­mond, perhaps you can split it into series? A brief history of French print­ing sounds inter­est­ing too.

    I took last year’s ALA survey, will have to com­plete it this year as well, as soon as I can fit it into my busy time slot.

    You’re very welcome for Klepas review. Thanks for the mention. It was my plea­sure to look under your site’s hood and study what makes it tick. ;)

  5. 5. Pascal
    Aug 16, 09:00

    @libervisco: I think the A List Apart Web Survey is tar­geted at devel­op­ers, design­ers, editors and gen­er­ally anyone who works some­where within the process of cre­at­ing web­sites as a part of their occupation—be it free­lance, as part of an agency or “in-house”; last year’s results were geared towards those within the indus­try to compare every­thing from wages to age, gender, racial and geo­graph­i­cal dis­tri­b­u­tions.

    A more general survey that better rep­re­sents private website owners—particularly those that do every­thing from design, tech­ni­cal imple­men­ta­tion and content—would be inter­est­ing but then detract in use­ful­ness as the those rep­re­sented would form only a small part of the total respon­dents. A survey tar­geted purely at this demo­graphic would make more sense. I don’t know of anyone who is working on some­thing like this at the moment though.

    Thanks—awesome to hear from you again mate. (:

  6. 6. johno
    Aug 24, 01:31

    Would also love to read your article on the ‘Gara­monds’.
    How about Sabon or the even better Sabon Next by Jean François Porchez.

  7. 7. Pascal
    Aug 24, 07:48

    @johno: Thanks! If you have digital copies of the faces I’d love a sample or two for the article. I’ve twit­tered you a message. Thanks.

Post a comment

Please share your thoughts or add a note if I missed something.

Required fields are marked by an asterisk (*). Your e-mail address is never published nor shared. You can use common text formatting XHTML elements (e.g. a, acronym, blockquote, code, em, strong, …). If you’d like to directly respond and link to another comment, you can do that using the Twitter-style @reply (i.e., @Randy Bender: …).

*
*